METODOLOGI PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN: Landasan Ilmiah dan Perencanaan Penelitian

SINOPSIS

Bagaimana mungkin pendidikan diperbaiki jika akar persoalannya belum benar-benar dipahami? Bagaimana mungkin sebuah penelitian menghasilkan kebenaran ilmiah jika sejak awal pertanyaan, metode, dan dasar pemikirannya tidak dibangun secara tepat?

Penelitian bukan sekadar mengumpulkan data, menguji hipotesis, atau memenuhi persyaratan akademik. Penelitian adalah keberanian mempertanyakan kenyataan, ketajaman menemukan persoalan, dan tanggung jawab membangun pengetahuan yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan. Dalam dunia pendidikan, kesalahan memahami masalah tidak hanya melahirkan kesimpulan yang keliru, tetapi juga berpotensi mengarahkan kebijakan dan praktik pendidikan menjauhi kebutuhan manusia yang sesungguhnya.

Buku referensi METODOLOGI PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN: Landasan Ilmiah dan Perencanaan Penelitian hadir untuk memperkuat fondasi berpikir ilmiah sebelum penelitian dilaksanakan. Melalui sembilan bab yang disusun secara sistematis, pembaca diajak menelusuri hakikat penelitian, landasan filosofis dan paradigma keilmuan, pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan metode campuran, etika dan integritas akademik, identifikasi masalah, penelusuran literatur, pengembangan teori dan hipotesis, penyusunan proposal, hingga penentuan populasi, sampel, dan partisipan penelitian.

Diperkaya dengan ilustrasi konseptual dan perangkat perencanaan yang aplikatif, buku ini ditujukan bagi mahasiswa, dosen, guru, peneliti, dan akademisi yang ingin membangun penelitian secara kritis, sistematis, etis, dan metodologis.

Sebab, penelitian yang bermutu tidak dimulai ketika data berhasil dikumpulkan, melainkan ketika seorang peneliti mampu mengajukan pertanyaan yang tepat, memilih jalan ilmiah yang dapat dipertanggungjawabkan, dan memahami untuk siapa pengetahuan itu dihasilkan.

Meneliti bukan sekadar mencari jawaban. Meneliti adalah memastikan bahwa jawaban yang ditemukan tidak mengkhianati kebenaran, ilmu pengetahuan, dan masa depan pendidikan.

Ukuran Buku : 15,5 cm x 23 cm

Jumlah Halaman : 322 Halaman

ISBN : Proses

Katalog Dalam Terbitan (KDT) : Proses

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Abend, G. (2008). The meaning of ‘theory’. Sociological Theory, 26(2), 173–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2008.00324.x

ALLEA. (2023). The European code of conduct for research integrity (Revised ed.). https://doi.org/10.26356/ECOC

Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating research questions through problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0188

American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2023). Standard definitions: Final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys (10th ed.). https://aapor.org/standards-and-ethics/standard-definitions/

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association. https://www.testingstandards.net/open-access-files.html

American Educational Research Association. (2006). Standards for reporting on empirical social science research in AERA publications. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X035006033

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). APA Style journal article reporting standards. https://apastyle.apa.org/jars

Bhaskar, R. (2008). A realist theory of science. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203090732

Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.2307/2088165

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). To saturate or not to saturate? Questioning data saturation as a useful concept for thematic analysis and sample-size rationales. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 13(2), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1704846

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE.

British Educational Research Association. (2024). Ethical guidelines for educational research (5th ed.). https://www.bera.ac.uk/publication/ethical-guidelines-for-educational-research-fifth-edition-2024

Campbell, M., McKenzie, J. E., Sowden, A., Katikireddi, S. V., Brennan, S. E., Ellis, S., Hartmann-Boyce, J., Ryan, R., Shepperd, S., Thomas, J., Welch, V., & Thomson, H. (2020). Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: Reporting guideline. BMJ, 368, l6890. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6890

Center for Open Science. (n.d.). Preregistration. https://www.cos.io/initiatives/prereg

Chafe, R. (2024). Different paradigm conceptions and their implications for qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241282871

Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd ed.). Wiley.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539

COPE Council. (2023). Authorship and AI tools [Position statement]. Committee on Publication Ethics. https://doi.org/10.24318/cCVRZBms

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Crossref. (n.d.-a). Registering updates. Retrieved October 17, 2026, from https://www.crossref.org/documentation/register-maintain-records/maintaining-your-metadata/registering-updates/

Crossref. (n.d.-b). REST API. Retrieved October 17, 2026, from https://www.crossref.org/documentation/retrieve-metadata/rest-api/

Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. SAGE.

DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2022). Scale development: Theory and applications (5th ed.). SAGE.

Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The theory of inquiry. Henry Holt and Company.

Education Endowment Foundation. (2024). A school’s guide to implementation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/implementation

Education Resources Information Center. (n.d.). ERIC thesaurus. Retrieved October 17, 2026, from https://eric.ed.gov/?ti=all

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

Flake, J. K., & Fried, E. I. (2020). Measurement schmeasurement: Questionable measurement practices and how to avoid them. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(4), 456–465. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920952393

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (M. B. Ramos, Trans.; 30th anniversary ed.). Continuum.

Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (Eds.). (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Graham, A., Powell, M., Taylor, N., Anderson, D., & Fitzgerald, R. (2013). Ethical research involving children. UNICEF Office of Research–Innocenti. https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/reports/ethical-research-involving-children

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Groves, R. M., & Peytcheva, E. (2008). The impact of nonresponse rates on nonresponse bias: A meta-analysis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(2), 167–189. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn011

Groves, R. M., Fowler, F. J., Jr., Couper, M. P., Lepkowski, J. M., Singer, E., & Tourangeau, R. (2009). Survey methodology (2nd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470465462

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 105–117). SAGE.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N., & Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732316665344

Hennink, M., & Kaiser, B. N. (2022). Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research: A systematic review of empirical tests. Social Science & Medicine, 292, Article 114523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114523

Hernán, M. A., & Robins, J. M. (2020). Causal inference: What if. Chapman & Hall/CRC.

Hernán, M. A., & Robins, J. M. (2020). Causal inference: What if. Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://miguelhernan.org/whatifbook

Holmes, A. G. D. (2020). Researcher positionality: A consideration of its influence and place in qualitative research: A new researcher guide. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 8(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.34293/education.v8i4.3232

Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2018). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315650982

Integrasi pengelola referensi dengan pengolah kata memungkinkan sitasi dan daftar pustaka diperbarui secara dinamis. Namun, perubahan manual pada daftar pustaka yang masih terhubung dapat hilang ketika dokumen diperbarui. Lebih baik memperbaiki metadata sumber, lalu memperbarui dokumen. Simpan salinan kerja sebelum perubahan besar. Dengan kebiasaan ini, peneliti mengurangi pekerjaan berulang dan menjaga konsistensi antara sumber yang dibaca, sumber yang dikutip, dan identitas yang dicantumkan (Zotero, n.d.-b).

Integritas Sitasi dan Pemeriksaan Akhir Kajian

Kecerdasan buatan dapat membantu menghasilkan variasi istilah pencarian, menata pertanyaan baca, atau menyunting bahasa. Akan tetapi, keluaran yang memuat identitas referensi harus diverifikasi pada penerbit, basis data, atau dokumen asli. Daftar pustaka yang tampak meyakinkan dapat berisi judul atau DOI yang tidak sesuai. Tanggung jawab atas isi tetap berada pada penulis; data peserta dan dokumen sensitif juga memerlukan perlindungan yang memadai (Miao & Holmes, 2023).

Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia. (2021). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 39 Tahun 2021 tentang integritas akademik dalam menghasilkan karya ilmiah. https://siska.untirta.ac.id/Website/ProdukHukum/lihat/f22ff720-cddd-4810-bc35-f6346fca2f16

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2

Ketepatan sitasi mencakup ketepatan makna. Sumber yang nyata tetap dapat disitasi secara keliru apabila digunakan untuk mendukung klaim yang tidak dibahasnya. Periksa setiap kalimat penting dengan membuka kembali bagian sumber yang relevan. Hindari menempatkan satu sitasi di akhir paragraf panjang yang memuat beberapa klaim berbeda tanpa memperjelas cakupannya. Pembaca harus dapat mengenali gagasan mana yang berasal dari sumber dan mana yang merupakan analisis peneliti.

Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Guilford Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (50th anniversary ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177

Lakens, D. (2022). Sample size justification. Collabra: Psychology, 8(1), Article 33267. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.33267

Leon, A. C., Davis, L. L., & Kraemer, H. C. (2011). The role and interpretation of pilot studies in clinical research. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 45(5), 626–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.008

Levitt, H. M., Bamberg, M., Creswell, J. W., Frost, D. M., Josselson, R., & Suárez-Orozco, C. (2018). Journal article reporting standards for qualitative primary, qualitative meta-analytic, and mixed methods research in psychology: The APA Publications and Communications Board task force report. American Psychologist, 73(1), 26–46. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000151

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2019). Statistical analysis with missing data (3rd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119482260

Lohr, S. L. (2022). Sampling: Design and analysis (3rd ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429298899

Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1(3), 86–92. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86

Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444

Maxwell, J. A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Menard, S. (2002). Longitudinal research (2nd ed.). SAGE.

Mertens, D. M. (2021). Transformative research methods to increase social impact for vulnerable groups and cultural minorities. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211051563

Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535

Michener, W. K. (2015). Ten simple rules for creating a good data management plan. PLOS Computational Biology, 11(10), Article e1004525. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004525

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2018). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Morgan, D. L. (2014). Pragmatism as a paradigm for social research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(8), 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800413513733

Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Percie du Sert, N., Simonsohn, U., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ware, J. J., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, Article 0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021

National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/belmont-report/read-the-belmont-report/index.html

National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/10236

NISO. (n.d.). CRediT role descriptors. https://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles-defined/

Nosek, B. A., Ebersole, C. R., DeHaven, A. C., & Mellor, D. T. (2018). The preregistration revolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(11), 2600–2606. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708274114

OECD. (2022). Who cares about using education research in policy and practice? Strengthening research engagement. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d7ff793d-en

OECD. (2023). Who really cares about using education research in policy and practice? Developing a culture of research engagement. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/bc641427-en

OECD. (2024). PISA 2022 technical report. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/01820d6d-en

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II)—Country notes: Indonesia. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/indonesia_c2e1ae0e-en.html

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

Pemeriksaan akhir dilakukan pada tiga lapisan. Lapisan pertama memeriksa isi: semua subbab menjawab tujuan dan tidak berulang tanpa fungsi. Lapisan kedua memeriksa argumen: teori, bukti, kesenjangan, dan posisi saling terhubung. Lapisan ketiga memeriksa sumber: semua sitasi memiliki pasangan daftar pustaka, metadata benar, dan tautan yang dicantumkan mengarah ke sumber yang dimaksud. Pemeriksaan ini dilakukan setelah revisi karena penghapusan paragraf dapat meninggalkan referensi yang tidak lagi digunakan.

Popper, K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.

Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK guide) and the standard for project management (7th ed.).

Republik Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 27 Tahun 2022 tentang pelindungan data pribadi. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/229798/uu-no-27-

Rethlefsen, M. L., Kirtley, S., Waffenschmidt, S., Ayala, A. P., Moher, D., Page, M. J., Koffel, J. B., & PRISMA-S Group. (2021). PRISMA-S: An extension to the PRISMA statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10, Article 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z

Robinson, K. A., Saldanha, I. J., & Mckoy, N. A. (2011). Frameworks for determining research gaps during systematic reviews (Methods Future Research Needs Report No. 2; AHRQ Publication No. 11-EHC043-EF). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK62478/

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, Article 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Sandelowski, M., Leeman, J., Knafl, K., & Crandell, J. L. (2013). Text-in-context: A method for extracting findings in mixed-methods mixed research synthesis studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 69(6), 1428–1437. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.12000

Sebagai tugas penutup, susun strategi pencarian untuk topik sendiri, baca dan nilai sejumlah artikel yang relevan, isi matriks, lalu tulis sintesis yang berakhir pada kesenjangan dan posisi penelitian. Jumlah artikel mengikuti kebutuhan cakupan, bukan menjadi ukuran tunggal mutu. Hasil yang diharapkan ialah kajian yang menjelaskan pengetahuan secara akurat, mengenali ketidakpastian, dan menyediakan alasan kuat bagi keputusan penelitian. Keterampilan tersebut berkembang melalui pembacaan, pencatatan, penulisan, dan pemeriksaan ulang yang dilakukan secara konsisten.

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.

Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. (1995). What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(3), 371–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393788

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, Article 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914

Tipton, E. (2013). Improving generalizations from experiments using propensity score subclassification: Assumptions, properties, and contexts. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 38(3), 239–266. https://doi.org/10.3102/1076998612441947

UK Data Service. (n.d.). Planning and governing research data. https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/learning-hub/data-producer-support/planning-and-governing-research-data/

UNESCO. (2021). UNESCO recommendation on open science. https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/recommendation-open-science

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/publication/technology

United Nations. (1989). Convention on the Rights of the Child. https://www.unicef.org/child-rights-convention/convention-text

Utamakan pembacaan sumber asli. Jika gagasan hanya diketahui melalui sumber lain dan sumber asli tidak dapat diperoleh, gunakan format sitasi sekunder secara jujur sesuai pedoman yang dipakai. Jangan memasukkan sumber asli ke daftar pustaka seolah-olah sudah dibaca. Untuk kutipan langsung, pastikan susunan kata dan lokasi benar. Untuk parafrasa, pertahankan batas makna dan jangan menghapus syarat penting yang menyertai pernyataan penulis.

van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6

Vasileiou, K., Barnett, J., Thorpe, S., & Young, T. (2018). Characterising and justifying sample size sufficiency in interview-based studies: Systematic analysis of qualitative health research over a 15-year period. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, Article 148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0594-7

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108

What Works Clearinghouse. (2022). What Works Clearinghouse procedures and standards handbook, version 5.0. U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Handbooks

Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371

Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3, Article 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18

Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 3087. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.

Zotero. (n.d.-a). Duplicate detection. Retrieved October 17, 2026, from https://www.zotero.org/support/duplicate_detection

Zotero. (n.d.-b). Word processor plugins. Retrieved October 17, 2026, from https://www.zotero.org/support/word_processor_integration

Format APA Style (7th Edition)

Majid, A., Qadar, M. (2026). METODOLOGI PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN: Landasan Ilmiah dan Perencanaan Penelitian. ABMESDRA Penerbit Pustaka.

Format Penulisan Lengkap

Majid, Abdul., Qadar, Muamar. (2026). METODOLOGI PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN: Landasan Ilmiah dan Perencanaan Penelitian. ABMESDRA Penerbit Pustaka.

Contoh Sitasi Dalam Teks

• Sitasi Parentetif: (Majid & Qadar, 2026)

• Sitasi Naratif: Majid & Qadar (2026)

PENULISAN SITASI