MELAMPAUI ANGKA: Penalaran Matematis, Pengukuran, dan Kebenaran dalam Kehidupan Manusia

SINOPSIS

Angka dapat dihitung dengan tepat. Tetapi apakah kesimpulan yang kita bangun darinya selalu benar?

Nilai akademik, rata-rata pendapatan, indeks kesejahteraan, grafik statistik, hingga hasil penelitian tampak memberi jawaban yang pasti. Di balik nilai ada proses belajar; di balik rata-rata penghasilan ada keluarga; di balik keputusan berbasis angka ada kehidupan yang menerima akibatnya. Padahal setiap angka memiliki asal-usul: definisi, asumsi, cara pengukuran, mutu data, dan batas penafsiran. Ketika hal-hal tersebut diabaikan, angka yang benar pun dapat mengantarkan manusia pada kesimpulan yang keliru.

MELAMPAUI ANGKA mengajak pembaca menelusuri hakikat matematika, kekuatan logika, keterbatasan indikator, makna data, ketidakpastian, dan perbedaan hubungan statistik dari sebab-akibat. Disampaikan melalui kajian ilmiah dan ilustrasi kehidupan, buku referensi ini mempertemukan ketelitian matematis dengan integritas berpikir.

Buku ini tidak mengajak manusia meninggalkan angka. Buku ini mengajarkan mengapa angka harus dipahami sebelum dipercaya—dan mengapa kebenaran menuntut lebih daripada sekadar ketepatan perhitungan.

Ukuran Buku : 15,5 cm x 23 cm

Jumlah Halaman : 179 Halaman

ISBN : Proses

Katalog Dalam Terbitan (KDT) : Proses

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

DAFTAR PUSTAKA BAB I

Achmad, A. (2026). Ar-Rahman human being theory: A moral-governed framework of human behavior in socio-economic life. ABMESDRA Penerbit Pustaka.

D’Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 44–48.

https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ325793

Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2026). Models in science. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2026 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2026/entries/models-science/

Hodgkin, L. (2005). A history of mathematics: From Mesopotamia to modernity. Oxford University Press.

https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198529378.001.0001

Horsten, L. (2026). Philosophy of mathematics. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2026 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2026/entries/philosophy-mathematics/

Iffah, R. D. L., Subanti, S., Usodo, B., & Nurhasanah, F. (2025). Systematic literature review: Ethnomathematics research in Indonesia. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 10(1), 28–40.

https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v10i1.5621

Kusaeri, A., Putrawangsa, S., Prahmana, R. C. I., Pardi, M. H. H., & Idrus, S. W. A. S. A. (2025). Ethnomathematical insights from the tide-forecasting calendar of an Indonesian coastal community into mathematics classroom. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(2), 581–602.

https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i2.pp581-602

National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. The National Academies Press.

https://doi.org/10.17226/9822

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing.

https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en

Reck, E., & Schiemer, G. (2025). Structuralism in the philosophy of mathematics. In E. N. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall 2025 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2025/entries/structuralism-mathematics/

Schwartz, R. K. (2018). A classic from China: The nine chapters. Convergence.

https://doi.org/10.4169/convergence20181231

Wigner, E. P. (1960). The unreasonable effectiveness of mathematics in the natural sciences. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 13(1), 1–14.

https://doi.org/10.1002/cpa.3160130102

DAFTAR PUSTAKA BAB II

Achmad, A. (2026). Ar-Rahman human being theory: A moral-governed framework of human behavior in socio-economic life. ABMESDRA Penerbit Pustaka.

De Toffoli, S., & Mancosu, P. (2026). The philosophy of mathematical practice. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mathematical-practice/

Dutilh Novaes, C. (2021). Argument and argumentation. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/argument/

Hanna, G. (2000). Proof, explanation and exploration: An overview. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 44(1–3), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012737223465

Hawthorne, J. (2025). Inductive logic. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logic-inductive/

Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2005). Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine, 2(8), e124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124

Lakatos, I. (1976). Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery. Cambridge University Press.

Munafò, M. R., Nosek, B. A., Bishop, D. V. M., Button, K. S., Chambers, C. D., Percie du Sert, N., Simonsohn, U., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Ware, J. J., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2017). A manifesto for reproducible science. Nature Human Behaviour, 1, Article 0021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-016-0021

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2019). Reproducibility and replicability in science. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25303

Raatikainen, P. (2020). Gödel’s incompleteness theorems. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/goedel-incompleteness/

Ridwan, R., & Haeruddin, H. (2026). Proof in mathematics education: A bibliometric analysis using R biblioshiny and VOSviewer. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v11i1.12803

Stylianides, A. J. (2007). Proof and proving in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38(3), 289–321. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034869

Stylianides, G. J., Stylianides, A. J., & Moutsios-Rentzos, A. (2024). Proof and proving in school and university mathematics education research: A systematic review. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 56, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01518-y

DAFTAR PUSTAKA BAB III

Achmad, A. (2026a). Ar-Rahman human being theory: A moral-governed framework of human behavior in socio-economic life. ABMESDRA Penerbit Pustaka.

Achmad, A. (2026b). Perilaku organisasi: Organisasi sebagai sistem perilaku manusia. ABMESDRA Penerbit Pustaka.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association. https://www.testingstandards.net/

Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2004). The concept of validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.1061

Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957

Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.2.269.18845

Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741

OECD, European Union, & European Commission, Joint Research Centre. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-en

OECD. (2024). How’s life? 2024: Well-being and resilience in times of crisis. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/90ba854a-en

Rustam, A., Zulaeha, O., Sari, W. R., & Widyastuti, S. R. (2024). Development of algebra test using the item response theory approach for junior high school students. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, 10(3), 847–858. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v10i3.11832

Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0

Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677–680. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.103.2684.677

United Nations Development Programme. (2024). Human development report 2023/2024: Breaking the gridlock: Reimagining cooperation in a polarized world. https://hdr.undp.org/content/human-development-report-2023-24

DAFTAR PUSTAKA BAB IV

Achmad, A. (2026b). Perilaku organisasi: Organisasi sebagai sistem perilaku manusia. ABMESDRA Penerbit Pustaka.

Anscombe, F. J. (1973). Graphs in statistical analysis. The American Statistician, 27(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1973.10478966

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2026). Standar data statistik 2025. Badan Pusat Statistik. https://www.bps.go.id/id/publication/2026/01/15/c733974d5ab8e5901826c2a8/standar-data-statistik-2025.html

Cleveland, W. S., & McGill, R. (1984). Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation, and application to the development of graphical methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79(387), 531–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1984.10478080

Gal, I. (2002). Adults’ statistical literacy: Meanings, components, responsibilities. International Statistical Review, 70(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-5823.2002.tb00336.x

Hasanah, U., Putrawangsa, S., Setiawati, F. A., & Purwanta, E. (2024). Statistical literacy in primary education: An analysis of Indonesian fifth-graders’ data interpretation and analysis skills. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(4), 1335–1356. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i4.pp1335-1356

Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 39 Tahun 2019 tentang Satu Data Indonesia. (2019).

Simpson, E. H. (1951). The interpretation of interaction in contingency tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 13(2), 238–241. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1951.tb00088.x

Spiegelhalter, D. (2019). The art of statistics: How to learn from data. Basic Books.

Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley.

United Nations. (2014). Fundamental principles of official statistics (General Assembly Resolution 68/261). https://unstats.un.org/fpos

Utari, R. S., Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, & Hapizah. (2025). Seeing data differently: Developing a local instructional theory for culturally relevant statistical literacy in Indonesian teacher education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(3), 915–936. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i3.pp915-936

Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA’s statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108

DAFTAR PUSTAKA BAB V

Achmad, A. (2026). Ar-Rahman Human Being Theory: A moral-governed framework of human behavior in socio-economic life. ABMESDRA Penerbit Pustaka.

Brier, G. W. (1950). Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Review, 78(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1950)078<0001:VOFEIT>2.0.CO;2

Gigerenzer, G., & Hoffrage, U. (1995). How to improve Bayesian reasoning without instruction: Frequency formats. Psychological Review, 102(4), 684–704. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.4.684

Gneiting, T., & Raftery, A. E. (2007). Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 102(477), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1198/016214506000001437

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/

International Organization for Standardization. (2018). ISO 31000:2018 risk management—Guidelines. https://www.iso.org/standard/31000

Kahneman, D., & Klein, G. (2009). Conditions for intuitive expertise: A failure to disagree. American Psychologist, 64(6), 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016755

Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Houghton Mifflin. https://www.loc.gov/item/21012860/

Sari, A. D., Suryadi, D., & Dasari, D. (2024). Learning obstacle of probability learning based on the probabilistic thinking level. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp207-226

Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507

Spiegelhalter, D. (2017). Risk and uncertainty communication. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 4, 31–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-010814-020148

Sulfiah, S. K., Cholily, Y. M., & Subaidi, A. (2021). Professional competency: Pre-service mathematics teachers’ understanding toward probability concept. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 6(3), 206–220. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i3.13779

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

Wasserstein, R. L., & Lazar, N. A. (2016). The ASA statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician, 70(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108

DAFTAR PUSTAKA BAB VI

Achmad, A. (2026). Ketahanan usaha berbasis sumber daya dan akhlakul karimah: Perspektif Ar-Rahman Human Being dalam pengelolaan usaha mikro. ABMESDRA Penerbit Pustaka.

Apriliana, L. P., Handayani, I., & Awalludin, S. A. (2019). The effect of a problem centered learning on student’s mathematical critical thinking. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 4(2), 124–133. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v4i2.8386

Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2017). The state of applied econometrics: Causality and policy evaluation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.3

Auxtero, L. C., & Callaman, R. A. (2021). Rubric as a learning tool in teaching application of derivatives in basic calculus. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 6(1), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i1.11449

Greenland, S., Pearl, J., & Robins, J. M. (1999). Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology, 10(1), 37–48.

Hernán, M. A., & Robins, J. M. (2020). Causal inference: What if. Chapman & Hall/CRC. https://miguelhernan.org/whatifbook

Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354

Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (2015). Causal inference for statistics, social, and biomedical sciences: An introduction. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139025751

Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, reasoning, and inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803161

Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/70.1.41

Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66(5), 688–701. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037350

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.

von Elm, E., Altman, D. G., Egger, M., Pocock, S. J., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Vandenbroucke, J. P. (2007). The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: Guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLOS Medicine, 4(10), e296. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296

Format APA Style (7th Edition)

Rais, D. (2026). Melampaui Angka: Penalaran Matematis, Pengukuran, Dan Kebenaran Dalam Kehidupan Manusia. ABMESDRA Penerbit Pustaka.

Format Penulisan Lengkap

Rais, Damar. (2026). Melampaui Angka: Penalaran Matematis, Pengukuran, Dan Kebenaran Dalam Kehidupan Manusia. ABMESDRA Penerbit Pustaka.

Contoh Sitasi Dalam Teks

• Sitasi Parentetif: (Rais, 2026)

• Sitasi Naratif: Rais (2026)

PENULISAN SITASI